OpenAI waxay u baahan tahay macallimiin caalami ah si ay uga hortagto khaldan-maalinnimadii hore
OpenAI ayaa maanta soo saartay koox cusub oo macallimiin aqoon-is-weyne ah u magac baxday AGMAI, kaas oo loo sameeyay inuu ka shaqeeyo sidii shirkaddu uga baxi lahayd khilaafka ka dhashay natiijooyinka ay soo saartay.
Kooxda cusub iyo xaqiiqooyinkeeda
OpenAI ayaa sheegtay in kooxda AGMAI ay ka kooban tahay saddex iyo toban qof, iyadoo ay ku jiraan macallimiin ka socda jaamacadaha ugu waaweyn adduunka sida Stanford, Harvard, iyo Oxford. Kooxda waxaa loo qabtay inay ku sugan tahay Jaamacadda IAS ee Princeton, oo ah meesha ay ka shaqayn jireen Einstein iyo Oppenheimer.
Shirkaddu waxay sheegtay in kooxdaan cusub loo sameeyay inay ka shaqeeyaan natiijooyinka cusub ee ay soo saarto, iyadoo ay ku jiraan inay helaan fursad hore oo ay arkaan baaritaannada OpenAI, balse aanay wax lacag ah ka heli doonin shirkadda.
Sababta loo sameeyay kooxda
OpenAI waxay horey u soo saartay natiijooyin aad u muhiim ah oo ka mid ah khilaafka caalamka, iyadoo ay ka mid yihiin inay ka jawaabto su'aalaha caalamka ee ku saabsan xaqiiqada iyo natiijooyinka. Kooxda cusub waxaa loo sameeyay inay ka shaqeeyaan sidii shirkaddu uga baxi lahayd khilaafka ka dhashay natiijooyinka.
Martin Hairer, oo ka mid ah kooxda, wuxuu sheegay in kooxdaan cusub loo sameeyay inay ka shaqeeyaan sidii shirkaddu uga baxi lahayd khilaafka ka dhashay natiijooyinka, balse aanay wax lacag ah ka heli doonin shirkadda.
Caqabadaha iyo su'aalaha
Macallimiintu waxay sheegeen in kooxdaan cusub ay ka shaqeeyaan sidii shirkaddu uga baxi lahayd khilaafka ka dhashay natiijooyinka, balse ay jiraan su'aalo badan oo la xiriira sida kooxdaan u shaqeyn karto. Macallimiintu waxay sheegeen in kooxdaan cusub ay ka shaqeeyaan sidii shirkaddu uga baxi lahayd khilaafka ka dhashay natiijooyinka.
Kooxdaan cusub waxaa loo sameeyay inay ka shaqeeyaan sidii shirkaddu uga baxi lahayd khilaafka ka dhashay natiijooyinka, balse ay jiraan su'aalo badan oo la xiriira sida kooxdaan u shaqeyn karto.
OpenAI has announced the creation of the Advisory Group on Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence (AGMAI), a nine-member independent panel of elite mathematicians hosted at Princeton's Institute for Advanced Study. The group will advise the company on how to review and communicate emerging mathematical results, following a period of controversy over how the company announced findings produced by its internal AI model.
The Panel's Structure and Independence
The nine-member AGMAI panel will be hosted by Princeton's Institute for Advanced Study (IAS) and will not receive payment from OpenAI. Members will be granted early access to the company's research and will advise on the review and communication of emerging results, including how to coordinate their dissemination and assess their significance.
OpenAI stated that the group's value depends on its members being able to exercise their own judgement and challenge the company's views. The panel can change its membership as it sees fit and can publicly comment on its impact on mathematics, though it remains unclear how much influence the group will actually have over OpenAI's decisions.
Origins and the Context of the Crisis
The group's formation came after OpenAI approached some of its members about establishing an external advisory board. Martin Hairer, a professor at Imperial College London and EPFL, wrote that the group is genuinely independent of OpenAI and any other frontier AI labs, and that members have not signed restrictive agreements governing what they can say publicly.
The panel was formed in response to a period of controversy when OpenAI's attempt to announce mathematical results led to accusations of scooping researchers, failing to credit human work, and stealing from those using its models. Hairer acknowledged that AI companies have been producing high-profile mathematical results whose publication and dissemination have been falling short of acceptable mathematical practice.
Challenges Ahead and the Roadmap
The group is currently gathering input through conversations with colleagues, a public feedback form, and discussion on Proofs and Prompts, a blog that has emerged as a key forum for mathematicians reckoning with AI's impact on the field. Hairer warned that members would be naive to believe that AI labs will not try to spin whatever the panel says in a way that suits their PR machine.
The panel faces the specific challenge of advising OpenAI on how to coordinate the release of a large number of significant results in mathematics that the company reports have been produced by its internal model. While the group is hardly a representative sample of the mathematical community, its members have stated they take the task extremely seriously and are acting in good faith.
Ilaha iyo xuquuqda sawirka
Sawir: The Verge Xigasho
